This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下拾英 / 摄影艺术 / 海鸥飞. Shot at Bluffer Park last Saturday.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-2
(#1627838@0)
-
Nothing 哈哈.
-noproblem(大可以);
2004-3-2
(#1627847@0)
-
I would like to see yours. :)
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-2
(#1627877@0)
-
我这里真的看不见. 你的LINK有问题.哈哈
-noproblem(大可以);
2004-3-2
(#1627886@0)
-
sorry! Let's try another link.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-2
(#1627903@0)
-
这次它看着我呢. 哈哈
-noproblem(大可以);
2004-3-2
(#1627977@0)
-
大雁双飞
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-2
(#1627907@0)
-
最好是由左向右飞,会更符合视觉习惯.感觉应该裁去图片上方的一群小鸟,感觉这群小鸟有煞风景,因为与图片的整体风格格格不入.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-2
(#1628464@0)
-
Thank you for your comment.Somebody said Mustang's logo should be another way with the same reason as you. The designer explained "...because Mustang is wild horse..." haha. I am unable to let those geese too. :D
For those seagulls at background, I didn't feel anything wrong. It is natural. The picture is not cropped.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-3
{298}
(#1629067@0)
-
Great to know your ideas.:)
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-3
(#1630060@0)
-
I don't think the seagulls in the background help to build or enhance the atmosphere for the image and their existing does limit the possible imagination which an image may convey to the viewers.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-3
(#1630066@0)
-
So if I took the photo, I would exclude the seagulls in the background for sure. I think the flying geese and their reflection in the water will be great enough to compose a lively image.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-3
(#1630073@0)
-
Thank you for sharing your opinion. I always thinking this kind of discussions are very helpful photography. Sorry for typing in English, 'cause there is no Chinese system in my office.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-4
(#1630412@0)
-
It's very nice to talk with you on the net because I can feel that you are very open-minded and I don't have to worry if my opinions are simple or even naive.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-4
(#1631647@0)
-
Photography critique must be open-minded, otherwise the comments won't help at all. Not only say good or bad, but must say why as well.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-5
(#1631860@0)
-
Can't agree more.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-9
(#1637808@0)
-
The picture you saw has not been cropped. I did consider to crop out those seagulls at background, but found that the image feels tide on top. I don't wanna use colone stamp to erase gulls or blur the background in PS.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-4
(#1630418@0)
-
I see. I hope that I can see more pictures created by you here.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-4
(#1631649@0)
-
Absolutely I will. I am active in several photography websites, such as bootek.com, 色影无忌, 色天地, photosig. My user name is 'bugu' there. :D I like Rolia for its rich information. Post more of your works please.
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-5
(#1631849@0)
-
Bugu, you're great.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-9
(#1637813@0)
-
The gulls really disturb viewer to concentrate on the subject, geese. On the other hand, I feel it shows the compatible in nature, motive and static, sound and silent...
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-4
(#1630425@0)
-
I like your description. You are so romantic!
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-4
(#1631652@0)
-
这个海鸥如同轰炸机,好吓人哦.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-2
(#1628459@0)
-
飞机快要降落了，起落架都放下了。
-needforspeed(BeAlert BeAlive);
2004-3-2
(#1628767@0)
-
hahaha
-jade(paper space);
2004-3-3
(#1629111@0)
-
This one was cropped. See the original below. Now that not complete, just cut more to have a close-up, maybe could 增加冲击力 :D
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-4
(#1630430@0)
-
Thank you for posting the original one.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-5
(#1631677@0)
-
Frankly speaking, I don't like it because the sky is too blue and the seagull's pose is too stiff. It looks like a paste on a blue board if there is no light on the seagull at all.
-yangtse(Yangtse);
2004-3-5
(#1631678@0)
-
加拿大的鸟们都越来越胖了。
-002(闲);
2004-3-2
(#1628467@0)
-
good place for living. :D
-cavalia(哈哈);
2004-3-3
(#1629223@0)
