This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 法律 / 有罪或者无罪，但是谁能回答这个问题："It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street."
-china-cat(chinacat);
2021-11-19
(#14122952@0)
-
com'on, I already point out your logic fraud: there is no connection between "armed civilians show up" and "invite violence". I think the opposite is true. Think about 1992 LA riot in Korean town. Those armed Korean keep their town in peaceful order.
-headbig(Let's Rock！);
2021-11-19
(#14123098@0)
+7
-
That is right!
-111111(快乐老家);
2021-11-19
(#14123104@0)
+2
-
.......doesn't deserve your time, even a second
-doris99(智🐮);
2021-11-19
(#14123110@0)
-
你这逻辑跟时空伴随者有的拼
-cocowen(coco);
2021-11-19
(#14123194@0)
+2
-
这其实是给BLM一个message，美国是你的，也是我的，但最终是我的。
-xz730000(笑一笑，十年少);
2021-11-19
(#14123204@0)
+1
-
法院是讲事实的，没必要过度政治解读，也和BLM无关，新闻经常扭曲事实，看客也经常按自己倾向解读
-bluefoil(*I*);
2021-11-19
(#14123220@0)
-
从有限的媒体报道看，我也倾向于那个年轻人无罪，因为当时已经是无政府状态，警察没有做他们应该做的事儿，平民有权保卫自己，唯一可以商榷的是这个年轻人是否有权代替警察巡逻，我觉得也可以，因为已经是无政府状态
-keysi(K.S);
2021-11-19
(#14123270@0)
+1
-
判决很正常，看过现场视频的人应该会得出正当防卫的结论。那些所谓的和平示威者追着带着AR-15的人打，是怀着什么样的心情？真的不怕死还是想着你不敢拿我怎么样？
-coolrock(coolrock);
2021-11-19
(#14123338@0)
+2