Around 1.2 million received doses high enough to induce leukemia, solid cancers and fetal damage. “My estimate is a conservative minimum,” Takada says.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-chinas-nuclear-tests/Around 1.2 million received doses high enough to induce leukemia, solid cancers and fetal damage. “My estimate is a conservative minimum,” Takada says.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-chinas-nuclear-tests/Around 1.2 million received doses high enough to induce leukemia, solid cancers and fetal damage. “My estimate is a conservative minimum,” Takada says.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-chinas-nuclear-tests/上面引用的那个19万的数字来自那位流亡维族医生和其他人的合作研究,这个医生来自哈密。问题是 先不说哈密距离罗布泊500公里,哈密和乌鲁木齐都是在罗布泊的上风处,罗布泊的下风处在若羌,因为罗布泊常年的风向是东北风。若羌是个人口稀少的地方。死19万人?扯。哈密和乌鲁木齐一定不受影响, 我不敢说。但是常识是核污染空气很难流向上风处。美国的核试验的平民补偿写的很清楚 只有下风方向的居民有可能得到补偿。BTW 拉斯维加斯离内华达核试验场100公里。
:
: