Please quote western civilization is what gave the world pretty much every God damn liberal precept that liberals are supposed to adore individual liberties, scientific inquiry, rule of law, religious freedom, women's rights, human rights, democracy, trial by jury, freedom of speech, please somebody stop us before we enlighten again. and since one can find all these concepts in today's Israel and virtually nowhere else in the Middle East. if anything the world would be better place if it had more Israels. Of course, this message falls on deaf ears to the current crop who reduce everything to being only victims or victimizers, so Israel is lumped in as the toxic fruit of the victimizing West. the irony being that all marginalized people live better today because of western ideals. not in spite of them Martin Luther King used Henry David thoreau's essay civil disobedience to help shape the civil rights movement. the UN's Universal Declaration of human rights owes its core to Rousseau and Voltaire. twice the knees never showed up for a sexual harassment seminar but without him there's no democracy. the cop who murdered George Floyd got 21 years for violating his Fourth Amendment rights and idea we got directly from John Locke who no one in college would ever study anymore because he's so old and so white been so dead so western. yes that's how simple the woke are, it's never about ideas if it was would they be cheering on Hamas for their liberation. liberation to do what? more freely preside over a country where there are no laws against sexual harassment, spousal rape, domestic violence, homophobia, honor killings, or child marriage? this is who liberals think you should stand with? women there should be so lucky as to get colonized by anybody else. and for the record the Jews didn't colonize Israel or anywhere ever except maybe Boca Raton. Gaza wasn't seized by Israel like India or Kenya was by the British Empire and the partitioning of the region wasn't decided by Jews. but by a vote of the United nations in 1947 with everyone from Russia to Haiti voting for it but apparently they don't teach this at drag queen story hour anymore. it is true that for too long we didn't study enough Asian or African or Latin American history. but part of the reason for that is frankly there's not as much to study. colleges replaced courses in western siv dead white men am I right they replaced that with world civilization classes, which is fine in theory but what it meant in practice? is you read queer poetry of the African diaspora instead of Shakespeare? and I'm sure there's value in both but as usual America only ever over corrects and so we're at this place now where the words western sieve became kind of a shorthand for white people ruined everything, but they didn't ruin everything. no they didn't live up to their own ideals for far too long and committed atrocities. but people back then were all atrocious the white ones depending on who had the power but it was the western enlightenment that gave rise to the notion that the law of the jungle should be curbed. Henry David. Thoreau John. Stuart Mill. Ralph Waldo. Emerson John. Jacques Rousseau three named dudes things like that we're the OG social justice warriors. the ideas that came through Athens. Rome. London. Paris. and yes Philadelphia or would make life good for most people in free societies today. that the individuals have value and even the powers that be must submit to the rule of law that punishment should not be cruel and unusual the cused get people people get a trial that there is such a thing as a war crime why is it that every other culture gets a pass. but the West is exclusively? the some of the worst things it's ever done you think only white people colonized historians estimate that they very non western. Mr. genghis Khan killed 40 million people and that was in the 13th century. he single handedly may have reduced the world's population by 11%. on the other hand he kind of made-up for it because he was such a prolific colonizer of vaginas. estimated 16 million people are his direct descendants. so stop saying western civilization like it's a contradiction in terms. it's not.

请引用西方文明给世界带来的几乎所有天杀的自由主义戒律，自由主义者本应崇尚个人自由、科学探索、法治、宗教自由、妇女权利、人权、民主、陪审团审判、言论自由，请在我们再次启发之前阻止我们。 当然，现在的人对这些信息充耳不闻，他们把一切都归结为受害者或加害者，因此以色列被归结为西方加害者的毒果。马丁-路德-金利用亨利-戴维-梭罗的 "非暴力反抗 "一文来推动民权运动的发展。 谋杀乔治-弗洛伊德的警察因侵犯他的第四修正案权利而被判 21 年，而我们的思想直接来自约翰-洛克，大学里没人再愿意学习他的思想，因为他太老太白太死太西方了。是的，觉醒者就是这么简单，这从来不是思想的问题，如果是思想的问题，他们会为哈马斯的解放而欢呼吗？在一个没有禁止性骚扰、配偶强奸、家庭暴力、仇视同性恋、名誉杀人或童婚的法律的国家，自由主义者认为你应该站在他们一边？加沙不是以色列占领的，就像印度或肯尼亚不是大英帝国占领的一样，该地区的分治也不是犹太人决定的，而是联合国在 1947 年投票决定的，从俄罗斯到海地，所有人都投了赞成票，但显然他们在变装皇后故事时间已经不教这个了。的确，长期以来，我们对亚洲史、非洲史或拉丁美洲史的研究不够，但部分原因是，坦率地说，可研究的东西并不多。大学用世界文明课取代了西方Siv死白人的课程，我说的对吗，这在理论上没有问题，但实际上意味着什么？你读的是非洲散居地的同性恋诗歌，而不是莎士比亚？ 我相信这两者都有价值，但美国人总是矫枉过正，所以我们现在的情况是，"西方筛子 "这个词成了白人毁掉一切的代名词，但他们并没有毁掉一切。但那时的人都是残暴的，白人的残暴取决于谁拥有权力，但正是西方的启蒙运动产生了应该遏制弱肉强食的观念。亨利-戴维 梭罗 约翰 斯图尔特-米尔 拉尔夫-瓦尔多 爱默生 约翰 雅克-卢梭 这三个叫得上名字的家伙 我们是OG社会正义战士。罗马 伦敦 个人是有价值的，即使是当权者也必须服从法治 惩罚不应该是残忍和不寻常的 被指控的人应该受到审判 战争罪这种东西是存在的 为什么其他所有文化都能被放过，而唯独西方？成吉思汗先生杀害了 4000 万人，而那是在 13 世纪。他单枪匹马就可能使世界人口减少了 11%。另一方面，他也弥补了这一损失，因为他是如此多产的阴道殖民者。据估计，有 1600 万人是他的直系后裔。因此，不要再把西方文明说成是自相矛盾的了。