×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

斯坦福的研究辛辛苦苦证明了新冠疫苗是防感染的,研究者没想到如今罗刹国的说法是疫苗不必防感染,拍马屁拍到马蹄上了。These findings add to the mounting evidence demonstrating that vaccination is extremely effective at preventing COVID-19 infection

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 以前的疫苗都是可以防感染的,(流感疫苗不算,从来就没成功过)比如打了MMR疫苗的人,极小可能得麻疹。新冠疫苗刚上市时是声称防感染有效率90%多的。后来被现实打脸,一点都不防感染。现在居然说疫苗不是用来防感染的,真是个罗刹国。 +6
    • 看看路透社的老新闻:Pfizer Inc said on Monday its experimental vaccine was more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 based on initial data from a large study, a major victory in the fight against the pandemic. +4
      Pfizer Inc said on Monday its experimental vaccine was more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 based on initial data from a large study, a major victory in the fight against the pandemic.
    • 打疫苗人士当初挤破头地寒风中大排长队地去打疫苗不就是为了防感染吗,现在居然说疫苗不必防感染,这么维护疫苗估计辉瑞ceo听到后要感动得热泪盈眶🥱 +9
      • 当初大家打乙肝疫苗,不就是为了预防乙肝?如果知道打了乙肝疫苗不防乙肝,谁会去打乙肝疫苗?如今罗刹国里指鹿为马,颠倒黑白,说疫苗不必防感染。3年前的事情都不记得了,比金鱼的记忆好不了多少。 +8
      • 体谅一下吧,有人连自己在一个帖子里说过什么都不知道,怎么会知道三年前为啥打疫苗呢? +5