犹他大学医院官网发表文章说几个研究都没有展现mRNA疫苗会增加血栓危险，但是疫情早期发现covid和“住院”病人之间有联系。相信科学的可以去看看。

moonhalf(石室矢)

Blood clotting is a well-recognized complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. U of U Health hematologist, Yazan Abou-Ismail, MD, answers questions about the association of blood clots with COVID-19 and certain vaccines.

Full Story:
https://healthcare.utah.edu/healthfeed/postings/2021/07/blood-clotting-covid19.php

(#15019032@0)
Last Updated: 2022-12-12
Note: This Post has been edited by modeartor.
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

你怎么读书滴？开头就说血栓是已经证实的疫苗副作用。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019201@0) +4

你怎么读书的。开头写的血栓和covid的关系 -moonhalf(石室矢); 2022-12-12 (#15019214@0)

开头标题明明是：BLOOD CLOTTING, COVID-19 AND VACCINES三角恋嘛。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019238@0) +2

仔细读：The Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines have not been shown to increase the risk of blood clots in multiple studies. -moonhalf(石室矢); 2022-12-12 (#15019294@0)

对呀，没有increae the risk, 但是还是有原始的risk，只是没有提高而已嘛。感染50%血栓风险，打疫苗50%血栓风险，这叫风险没提高，但是打了疫苗又感染了病毒，那岂不是风险加倍？好吓人哦。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019304@0) +4

都告诉你没提高了，还琢磨加倍啥啊。回炉学校好好练练 -moonhalf(石室矢); 2022-12-12 (#15019479@0) +1
可不可以这样理解？have not been shown，可能有危险，也可能没危险，总之没有显示出来。就象你很有钱，但没有show出来，咱也不能因此说你穷啊。 -bottom(核桃夹子); 2022-12-12 (#15019983@0)

赶紧看了一眼，我一逻辑哈，感觉德国尸检大师切开血管看见的，新冠导致血栓，如果血管堆积多的就堵死了，年轻的新冠帮助堆积所以以后看得见的各种血栓病会比新冠之前多，同理疫苗也有小小血栓作用但是比新冠引起的小（因为疫苗是要造成类似新冠的反应） -1yizhen(yizhen); 2022-12-12 {32} (#15019246@0) +1
课代表发文要给个中心思想比较好😊

我觉得原文说得已经挺清楚的了：The Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines have not been shown to increase the risk of blood clots in multiple studies. mRNA疫苗不会增加血栓风险。 -moonhalf(石室矢); 2022-12-12 (#15019508@0)

提个建议,当阅读词义有分歧的时候,应该让狗来裁判 -xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba); 2022-12-13 {2845} (#15020239@0)
COVID-19 疫苗会引起血栓吗？
在多项研究中，Moderna 或 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA 疫苗并未显示会增加血栓风险。然而，两种 COVID-19 疫苗与一种极为罕见的综合征有关，这种综合征被称为疫苗诱发的血栓性血小板减少症(VITT)。它于 2021 年 3 月被发现与阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗有关，后来又与强生 COVID-19 疫苗有关。在极少数情况下（百万分之 2 到 20）身体产生的抗体作为疫苗的副作用会导致血小板不受控制地激活。这会导致血小板计数低和血块形成。
这种罕见抗体的出现是一个随机事件，与一个人的病史或任何特定条件没有已知关联。“无法预测谁可能会产生触发 VITT 的罕见抗体，”Abou-Ismail 说。“虽然与其他人群相比，它在年轻女性中更为常见，但即使在该群体中也极为罕见。”
Do COVID-19 vaccines cause blood clots?
The Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines have not been shown to increase the risk of blood clots in multiple studies. However, two COVID-19 vaccines are associated with an extremely rare syndrome known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). It was discovered in March 2021 in connection to the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and then later with the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. In rare cases—2 to 20 per million—antibodies that the body produces as a side effect of the vaccine lead to uncontrolled activation of platelets. This causes both low platelet counts and blood clots to form.
The occurrence of this rare antibody is a random event without a known association with a person’s medical history or any particular conditions. “There’s no way to predict who’s likely to develop the rare antibody that triggers VITT,” Abou-Ismail says. “While it is a little more common in younger women compared to other populations, it remains exceedingly rare even in that group.”

....individuals are at a significantly higher risk of developing a blood clot from COVID-19 infection than following COVID-19 vaccination. -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-12 (#15019247@0)

那打了疫苗又得了新冠，那岂不是double higher risk? 因为疫苗不防infection呀？哈哈 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019278@0) +2

这个就属于尴尬而不失礼貌的笑。 -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-12 (#15019285@0) +1

你看，引用的结论，居然自相矛盾，这就是你们奉若神明的“权威”。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019291@0) +2

你开心就好啊。 -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-12 (#15019298@0) +1

你看，一到严谨的逻辑分析，你们就环顾左右而言它了。完全经不起推敲嘛。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019308@0) +2

有什么可以推敲的，白纸黑字写得那么清楚你都能胡搅蛮缠，还有讨论的必要吗？ -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-12 {136} (#15019315@0) +2

individuals are at a significantly higher risk of developing a blood clot from COVID-19 infection than following COVID-19 vaccination.

打了疫苗又感染了结果呢？这个现象很普遍呀？ -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019329@0) +2

你们通过新闻里描述的病情远程诊断就可以。 -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-12 (#15019334@0) +1

你引用的这句话，仅仅适用于打了疫苗，可以防感染，才有意义。因为不感染，就可以极大降低血栓风险。可现在不是这样，官方都说：疫苗不防传染。那么血栓风险加倍。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-12 (#15019341@0) +5

【风险加倍】，是说打了疫苗比不打疫苗得血栓的风险加倍吗？楼顶文章里有数字，你可以用这些数字给我个推导过程吗？ -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-13 (#15020264@0)

你引用的那句话就是这个结论嘛，不用推导，事实也证明如此，加拿大接种疫苗后新冠重症住院人数比例，高于疫苗接种比例，加拿大官方数据显示，住院重症病人绝大多数是接种疫苗的。 -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-13 (#15020351@0) +1

【与接种疫苗相比，个体因感染新冠而形成血栓的风险要高得多】。这句话可以推出【打了疫苗，血栓风险加倍】这样的结论？那我可能确实是老糊涂了。 -897102(路人甲的假马甲); 2022-12-13 (#15020375@0)

这句话的意思是：接种疫苗会有血栓风险，但是比感染新冠后形成血栓风险要低。我请问你：接种疫苗后，又感染了新冠而发病，难道不是这两种风险叠加吗？ -lovedrive(深蓝爷爷); 2022-12-13 (#15020395@0) +1

门外汉我一直这样感觉，得新冠时一定要吃肠溶阿司匹林，打疫苗时也要吃 -1yizhen(yizhen); 2022-12-12 (#15019290@0)

没有发现危险，又不是发现没有危险。略过。 -bottom(核桃夹子); 2022-12-12 (#15019460@0)

@San Francisco

犹他大学医院官网发表文章说几个研究都没有展现mRNA疫苗会增加血栓危险，但是疫情早期发现covid和“住院”病人之间有联系。相信科学的可以去看看。

Replies, comments and Discussions:

COVID-19 疫苗会引起血栓吗？

Do COVID-19 vaccines cause blood clots?

More Topics