×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

为什么印度没有使用辉瑞和摩德納的疫苗?因为印度卫生部长不愿意与他们签免责条款。没有免责条款的保护,他们都不敢在印度卖疫苗。白花花的银子不赚,一定是风险大过收益。而有的国家的政府,不仅签了免责条款,还要强制施打。很多西方政客的良心,真的比不上印度的官员。

Why were Pfizer and Moderna vaccines not available in India? Health minister responds

WION Web Team
New Delhi Published: Feb 18, 2022, 11:59 PM(IST)

Mandaviya Photograph:( India.com )

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

For the first time, India’s health minister has revealed the reasons that forced India to rely heavily on indigenous vaccines

India’s Covid inoculation programme is largely driven by Indian made vaccines.

Even though Russia’s Sputnik and Johnson & Johnson's single-dose vaccine were given a go-ahead by the Indian drug regulatory authority, it was Indian made Covaxin and Covishield that was widely used under the government-run vaccine programme.


But it begs the question as to why Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were not available in India.

For the first time, India’s health minister has revealed the reasons that forced India to rely heavily on indigenous vaccines.


When India was reporting more than 100,000 Covid cases in November 2021, it was negotiating with Moderna and Pfizer to secure their vaccines.

However, the negotiation fell through and India went ahead with its own inoculation plan.

It was never revealed before as to why the discussions didn’t work out, even as the Indian government faced mounting criticism.

But during the book launch of ‘A Nation to Protect’ in New Delhi, health minister Mansukh Mandaviya revealed why the Indian government didn’t procure the vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.  

When Sudhir Chaudhary, Editor In Chief of WION, asked about the reasons, Mandaviya said that Moderna and Pfizer had placed a condition before the Indian government that it would only their vaccines if an indemnity clause is signed.

It means that if there is any side effect or if someone dies after taking the vaccine, then the company will not be held accountable and prosecuted under Indian law.

This caused problems for India.

The health minister said that it didn’t seem wise for the Indian government to accept their demands, and instead went ahead with the indigenous vaccines.

Sign in and Reply Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 为什么印度没有使用辉瑞和摩德納的疫苗?因为印度卫生部长不愿意与他们签免责条款。没有免责条款的保护,他们都不敢在印度卖疫苗。白花花的银子不赚,一定是风险大过收益。而有的国家的政府,不仅签了免责条款,还要强制施打。很多西方政客的良心,真的比不上印度的官员。 +25

    Why were Pfizer and Moderna vaccines not available in India? Health minister responds

    WION Web Team
    New Delhi Published: Feb 18, 2022, 11:59 PM(IST)

    Mandaviya Photograph:( India.com )

    STORY HIGHLIGHTS

    For the first time, India’s health minister has revealed the reasons that forced India to rely heavily on indigenous vaccines

    India’s Covid inoculation programme is largely driven by Indian made vaccines.

    Even though Russia’s Sputnik and Johnson & Johnson's single-dose vaccine were given a go-ahead by the Indian drug regulatory authority, it was Indian made Covaxin and Covishield that was widely used under the government-run vaccine programme.


    But it begs the question as to why Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were not available in India.

    For the first time, India’s health minister has revealed the reasons that forced India to rely heavily on indigenous vaccines.


    When India was reporting more than 100,000 Covid cases in November 2021, it was negotiating with Moderna and Pfizer to secure their vaccines.

    However, the negotiation fell through and India went ahead with its own inoculation plan.

    It was never revealed before as to why the discussions didn’t work out, even as the Indian government faced mounting criticism.

    But during the book launch of ‘A Nation to Protect’ in New Delhi, health minister Mansukh Mandaviya revealed why the Indian government didn’t procure the vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.  

    When Sudhir Chaudhary, Editor In Chief of WION, asked about the reasons, Mandaviya said that Moderna and Pfizer had placed a condition before the Indian government that it would only their vaccines if an indemnity clause is signed.

    It means that if there is any side effect or if someone dies after taking the vaccine, then the company will not be held accountable and prosecuted under Indian law.

    This caused problems for India.

    The health minister said that it didn’t seem wise for the Indian government to accept their demands, and instead went ahead with the indigenous vaccines.

    • 都被收买了! 看看最新发表的副作用表,触目惊心! +18
      • 确实如此!并且还打着科学的名义,干着见不得人的勾当!只是可怜了那些受害者。 +17
        这里是一位受害者的视频。情绪脆弱的就不建议看了。
        • she virtually has no risk for covid but now her life, and her family's life is done. This nonsense needs to stop! +5
        • 好像celine dion也是这个问题,肌肉痉挛 +1
          • Celine is in high risk so I support her taking the vaxx. But for this lady, in her 20s, how horrible the vaxx did to her! This is inexcusable. All behind this should be put in trial for anti-humanity.
            • 这和赵家人一样,这样的celebrity也一样逃不脱疫苗,多少明星因为疫苗走了,在全球主义者面前,谁都是可以牺牲的。只有很少一部分人是那个核心的人物。 +1
    • 土豆基金在疫苗公司占了40%的股份。。。😊爽啊 +15
    • 印度是世界上最大的疫苗生产国之一,印度自己生产2种新冠疫苗,英国的阿斯利康,印度自己研发的Covaxin,以及批准使用俄罗斯的Sputnik V。印度自己每个月生产8千万以上的疫苗,价格不到辉瑞和Moderna的十分之一,为啥要用辉瑞和Moderna的疫苗? +8
      • 1. 辉瑞疫苗上市时,印度疫苗还在研发。2. 如果辉瑞疫苗被政府批准,它就可能在印度当地生产,成本会大大降低。3. 如果辉瑞疫苗要比本土疫苗效果好、副作用少,可以占领印度的高端市场。 +1
        • 辉瑞疫苗是不可能在印度生产的。根本建立不起来这种工厂 +1
    • 你还不如直接表扬天朝,鹅罗丝,比印度更有说服力。 +2